State: California City: San Francisco Clear all filters (5 of 470 reviews match)
filters
state:
city:
product:
Show
The advertise "free" background checks,then blatently ask for credit card. Unbelievable. We have lost our ability to even be surprised or outraged at sleazy liars. Sad. Avoid them, do not waste your time. I am done but must add this to reach 100 words. About...
Read more
#422771
Reply to reviews
The website promises something that it won't deliver until you sign up for a more expensive service. Only God knows what happens after that, since this is a 3 tiered program. In addition to really only offering what can be had for free - for a mere $14.95, I'm...
Read more
#408599
Reply to reviews
This company advertise, that they can help you to get information by reverse phone look up. That is a lie!. Several times I tried - they didn't provide no information, and also refused to issue any credit! They claim, that information is not guaranteed. So,what did...
Read more
#278056
Reply to reviews
Peoplefinders got me by indicating they had the name to a reverse number search when in fact after paying, they had none. I was tricked into paying for information they said they had when there was nothing. When I contacted them, they said tough luck and to read their...
Read more
Anonymous
VERY RICH PERSON WHO DOES NOT

I HAVE BEEN SCAMMED BY THIS COMPANY. JUST BE CAREFUL. I AM FILING A POLICE REPORT ON PEOPLEFINDERS. THEY NEED TO BE STOPPED.

#257207
Reply to reviews
I have signed up with other people search sites and they were failures. I tried the free try out with People Finders and forgot to cancel, but every time i tried to find someone I came up with a page asking for more money! Everywhere I turned they wanted more and more...
Read more
Anonymous
Christina

I paid $48 bucks to peoplefinders.com to do some background searches. THe Information is incorrect. Half the birthdays on the site are wrong. IT says my 63 year old Grandma is...

Anonymous
us

\"This is bait and switch if nothing else - isn\'t it?\" No it isn\'t.

#238925
Reply to reviews